Roughstuff's Korean War Archive
book reviews and summaries, comments, analysis
Sorry, your browser doesn't support Java(tm).

Shrader, Charles Communist Logistics in the Korean War
DS 918 S515 1995

To an unschooled reader war consists of soldiers with small arms, artillery, air support and naval gunfire. Like all hasty generalizations, this one is misleading. Logistics: the science of delivering materiel in a timely fashion, is the unsung hero in many wars. By the way I say science of logistics: if you don't believe me pick up a graduate textbook on Linear Programming or Network Analysis. In any case, Shrader's book is a useful, if dry, explanation of communist logistics and the role this played in the korean war. Well illustrated, footnoted, with numerous charts and graphs, the book is an easier read than you might think.

The Korean climate and countryside imposed two important limitations on movement of materiel.

These two features, combined with the low quality and poorly maintained rail and roadway network, meant that the communists had to be creative and relentless in overcoming logistical obstacles.
Shrader breaks the Korean war into three periods, based upon the logistical factors that affected communist ability to fight sustain offensives. Neither North Korea nor China were in good enough shape to provide the In-min-gun with raw materials and industrial supplies: most heavy industrial/armaments came from the Soviet Union. The USSR used its leverage as a supplier to manipulate the Chinese and protect its wider geopolitical interests. [These interests were not so much a victory in Korea as an opportunity to bog down UN forces and distract attention from the European theatre.] Still the north had some internal production, left over from the Japanese factories; the NK's used alot of captured materiel, especially in the early part of the war. Local populations often were induced or forced to provide food and labor, sometimes compensated with 'rice notes' that could bused to pay taxes.

Communist soldiers carried only half as much as UN forces did; mostly less field equipment.
Shafer believes UN air-interdiction efforts turned the tides of the war very early on; after July 8, 1950 (at Chonan] convoys and troop trains could only move at night. By mid July serious shortages of food and medicine had limited effectiveness of NK forces. Despite the ballyhoo about the Manchurian sanctuary, the author suggests immunity of bases in China proved to be only a minor constraint. Nonetheless, summing up, the author makes clear that Air Force and Navy sorties prevented the UN from losing the war; but they could not 'win' it for UN forces. Interdiction never succeeded in 'isolating' communists on the front lines. By sheer persistence and creativity, a manageable amount of materiel reached their combat zones.




Now that you have read the review...