Gay Military Book Review Page



Welcome to a special page of Roughstuff's Korean War Book Reviews, a page that deals specifically with the issue of gays in the US armed forces. I eventually will steer this page to the issue of gays in the Korean War, specifically; I am currently doing the research in that area. For now, I will review popular media texts and books on the issue. Since my primary focus of my website is the War itself, rather than specific subtopics, this subpage will grow more slowly than the other book review pages. Also, because of the controversial nature of this subject matter, the links to this specific page from other areas on my site will be limited and carry a caveat that this subject is recommended for adults only. As always, commentary is solicited and encouraged, and if you have book reviews that you would like to submit, I will print them here with full acknowledgment. Happy reading!!!




There is one other reason why this page exists. I want to have a rational, reasonable and unemotional discussion of the role gays have played in the military, not just in the US, but elsewhere and throughout history. Most of the popular books are not much more than kiss-and-tell stories . (coming up in a few days in my book review section...Randy Shilts' Conduct Unbecoming; Donna Jackson's Honorable Discharge and Steven Zealands Barrack Buddies and Soldier Lovers. ) I think you can tell from the context that my initial impression of these books is not good, and is not likely remain so as i reread them and analyze them a bit.

To get the juices flowing, let me start with the following subject, and I will expand on it when I review the books above. I am constantly asked the question how can you be both gay and republican?? Let me tell you that these days, with Republicans selling out their libertarian agenda faster than Clinton sells the Lincoln/Hillary Bedroom, it ain't fuckin' easy! I am a republican...proudly so and always so. But I am a free market, individualist republican. I am not one of these Eastern Establishment republicans-- George Bush comes to mind-- who thinks it is the purpose of the government to intrude in our lives for right wing causes, instead of left wing ones. In fact, if I may borrow a weapon from our enemies, I daresay that George Bush was the biggest faggot the White House has seen in the postwar era. In any case, a true conservative/libertarian believes it is your ability that matters....not your race, not your sex, not your color, and yes Virginia, not your sexual preference. To prove my point, hear from that absolute pariah of weeping liberals, but absolute captain of free-market ideologues, Barry Goldwater. Several years ago he penned an article in several national newspapers on the subject, which has become a classic.

click here to read Barry Goldwaters' article on Gays in the US Armed Services.




Gay/Lesbian Military Book Reviews



Shilts, Randy Conduct Unbecoming
Lesbians and gays in the US Military from Vietnam to Desert Storm

This book tries to be everything to everyone-- a common weakness amongst radicals in general and gays in particular-- and it fails miserably. This is another one of these books that wastes precious paper pining for the tie-die days of Woodstock, The Summer of love, Kennedys, and the Warren Court. Those days are gone..forever, I hope, but in any case, gone. This book won't bring them back. In fact, by childishly concerning itself with documentaries about the 'flourishing gay subculture' in the military, it probably set the movement back with mainstream America.

I will resist the temptation to write a copious reply/review to Shilt's literary miasma. Just a few simple points....

On and on the litany goes. What is most annoying about this book is it has largely set the standard for the level of debate about gays in the military--surely a low standard, at that-- and set the stage for subsequent gay/military texts. Readers, therefore, should not be surprised at the content of the book who's review follows; nor at my review of it.

Zeeland, Steve. Barrack Buddies and Soldier lovers.
Dilalogues with Gay Men in the US Military.

Shilts' book, by discussing court cases and service purges against and gays and lesbians, maintains at least a facade of respectability. Zeelands book doesn't even do that. The author himself said it best: "the purpose of this book is not to convince the reader that gays make good soldiers or deserve to be allowed to serve their country..." OoooooooK! Instead, this homoerotic text seems to be the world longest personal ad, with Zeelands picture on the back. He doesn't include his phone number, but you can see more at his website. In the meantime the reader can delight in the most bizarre kiss-and-tell book (the author has fucked half the interviewees and wants to fuck the other half, apparently) ever written. You figure out how the following will improve the acceptance of homosexuality in our society..I can't!

God!!What a great step forward for acceptance of homosexuality this book is!

Jackson, Donna Honorable Discharge
Memoirs of an Army Dyke

Oh Donna honey...I will be eternally grateful to you for introducing the expression 'cluster fuck'-- apparently a military term for what happens when a bunch of soldiers hurry up and wait for orders. This is a great book. As a certified misogynist, I must admit so much of this book was new to me, simply because I have gone so far in making my life a woman-free-zone that the little things women must put up with--in the military and out--were all insights. I must admit, also, that I never knew women referred to each other as 'cunts'-- even in moments of anger.

In any case, this book can be divided into two parts. The first and longest part is a diary of Jackson's experiences, her life in the military, her family, her values. Unlike Steve Zeeland's cock-and-bull stories, Jackson focuses on the emotional side of being gay: her soul, her relationships. Not all were consensual either..whether it was outright rapes by a few of her male soldier buddies, or an overly aggressive black woman in the barracks one night. Jackson concentrates on her life as a Soldier who is a Lesbian (rather than a Lesbian Soldier). This is a pleasant change from Randy' Shilts vaporous constitutional tomes or Zeelands testicular automotons with rifles.

When called up for Desert Storm, another one of America's military voyeurisms sans declaration, Jackson decided, simply, that 'if I was gonna fight and possibly die for my country in a war, then I'd sure as hell go as the person I am.' Kind of reminds me of the old sixties protest song...

Your old enough to kill
but not for votin'
sau you don't believe in war
but whats that gun your totin'?

And a good question it is, one I'd love to see the mollycoddled JCS and our President squirm and answer on live national televison. How about a town meeting in Ohio, fellas?? I commend Ms. Jackson for her personal bravery and poise needed to stake a stand on this issue.

Now, critics may respond that Jackson's johnny-come-lately activism was timed more to embarass the military at a crucial moment, than ann new assessment of her moral dilemma as a lesbian in the military. Maybe so. Tuff shit! Any military person should know that you strike your enemy at his most vulnerable time. Still, if Jackson thinks/thought the news media were going to stand tall for her cause any further than just a cute story, I certainly hope she has wised up in the interim.

These last few chapters are, however, a big change in style and content. Instead of hearing about Donna Jackson, the person, we hear about Donna Jackson, the latest Gays-in-the-Military posterperson. Its too bad Donna got swept up in the "I came out now everybody else must come out too" syndrome that is so prevalent among the homo-intelligentsia. It is the same mentality that is used to call conservative blacks 'uncle toms' and 'oreos' even to this day.
The war to accept gays into society and into our military, like all wars, must be fought on all fronts and by people comfortable with the combat role they have taken. For some, such as Ms Jackson, that role may be to be 'out' and at the top of a media frenzy. For others, such as Gregg who wrote to her in Stars and Stripes May 8 1991, the battle is fought behind the lines for people's hearts and souls, one by one. If Ms. Jackson can't live with that, she can go fuck herself like she did in her expose On Our Backs.